I have used methods of production from assumption on what I believed was the way it should or could be done. This was either a move in ignorance or englightenment that is not a decision I can make. However the cost for new technologiy means that cost and retail are often not in par. It somehow makes one startled to see what I have paid and presented especially via Metal 3D printing, nevermind what the prices I was quoted for the same thing. That must have a reason I will no longer ignore. Just to say many percent plus difference, which by account may or may not equate to quality possibly a finish or material or clientelle?
My models are with those companies I have use and they are not public as yet.
Locality and knowledge has value which is subjective like most things, the role of structure/ infastructure however has a much larger outlook. Which I would be foolish to ignore. National thinking seems to have regional ignorance except with global players
Casts are not original that is why they are called reproductions.
Market price for what I have foolishly made pubic in order to satisfy my own peace of mind, from working in isolation will now be adjusted accordingly cannot speak of quality of reproduction. As that has not yet happened.
I have used very repuatble companies in order to place custom images and prints upon this site. Which those who have not understood the perspective i was coming from and the benefits it entailed may now be like me at a loss in this guise.
The limb of the branch has broken, Just because the way something is done is different is not always a hindrence when what has occured before was or is seen as a step on the progressive path and its the driving force. One anything can try as it might but can not be more unless its diluted/divided/ etc Love well that something else we try in ……..
Has the outlook formed via hexatrigon changed my outlook somewhat yes.
Is that it is more hexagonal than triangular?
Or more triangular than hexagonal?
Although the internal space formed by its geometry is still an unchartered domain where those more practical discoveries that are yet to be made or realised.
The platform used to create the products and images seen on this domain were created on a mac. This is not about status or critique on other platforms. Since creating Hexatrigon it has become more of an issue that the platform is less compatible for engineering / CAD production. Or more precisely the shape
The understanding of manufacturing infrastructure depends on earlier developments so that dynamic makes sense. However even though costs can overcome this problem that is not something that will immediately change. However I do not believe the shape would exist, in such platforms, as the 3D form would not ‘close’, and not made up with other polygonal forms.
Does that mean it should not exist?
It clearly does, and follows the principles of regular polyhedra.
The creation of the solid digital model that produced the model I call hexatrigon was exported as .stl. Further reading on the field that this format inhabits was as new as the creation was for me. More research on the infrastructure of the technology has me recognising the new dynamics and not just for me.
The UK is the base from which I create and from a extremely insulated position, that is displayed on this domain. The limited exposure to the market was largely subjectively, protection based in the sense of ownership, not with the ear to its global movements. Coincidence has happened in the sense that links and references placed on this domain are part of the same movement but isolated. Not being part of the larger thinking and not recognising the current infrastructure as the immediate target for the use of additive manufacture. Hexatrigon would not exist or be distributable without it. The experiences of Heaxtrigons’ digital production has been a steep learning curve, which has been at cutting edge driven by a singular obsession of making it real. If the difference in the metal frame models of its form with or without spheres on its vertices (that image of problem is not my property ) not its materials is limited by production limitation governed by their programming it was not a conscious disruptive move.
However it is a product of the technology that produces the best representations in terms of precision of its form.