I opened the box!!

It seems as though the protolabs print in maraging steel that has a different hoop allows the chain which is pictured in one of these posts through. Although hoops are hoops this particular one does seem to not only perform it is quite recognisable in other places. See an alternative view clearly visible here. However it is also on this site already.

.3 difference

I posted a link on trojanthinking of a shorter vid showing balance achieved with a tea light candle wick holder, This is the longer one showing the difference. `a  leaf from my second run silicone casting initiated the scales, with a fortunate vibration


red dumpling

I ended up painting the yellow thing, it allowed for a reinterpretation of spinning. Not exactly forward thinking in technological terms however it does show what I tried to show quite early on in regards symmetry. I created a few images to relay this not many made it so view.


You can have them cost or not. They were bagged before covid-19 what I have left. Or have a word with the manufacturers. Good cause and all that! I’m stuck in that regards

never thought of how you could give a kiss without touching before very strange times indeed XXI st century

The last purchase contain,

A device to add to the top of a can to disperse the contents, it was made by the same manufacturer for which I bought the spray way back in 2016-17. (won’t post that)

I posted a shot of the heart that was done that way, may have had the words one love or mi luv yu bad not too sure. You can tell these ones as they have slight scratches on them.  The ones lost to me where very clear indeed, then if anything sprayed with the matte varnish. They were not as easily scratched. Shame I no longer have them.

The below shot is what remains beyond the the two I have. The design mark that is missing and the middle one on the bottom row (tile that is)

Colour is not the matter


Trying to make clear

registered Hexatrigon as image

When the term ‘lived experience’ entered my lexicon, it was on the basis of a question on being(existence) via Fanon, the reply to that (if pursued) was to be wrapped in the time frame of the term ‘lived experience’. On researching, it did not follow my question, yet just used a component of it in terms of an observational trait, to be instituted.

As this did not satisfy my actual experienced research. That line of investigation  ended.

The shape was not an analytical construct , yet as now having a presence it will know doubt be.

Point one, a certain program created it. The same program exported it.

Point two, a particular manufacturing process could print it. Both the creation and its subsequent learning were different to anything I knew beforehand.

The expectations of then known norms to produce it were speculations before seeing it through. Those proved it could not be done. However as it was present to view, which by default of the associated trade meant it could be manufactured.

Beyond the hand created versions that proved conceptually it was possible, no other reasonings are necessary. The properties the form possesses are consequential.

Believe it or not.  The end.

Part of my lived experience?  yes. Do I use it to address what was not? debatable! probably not. Did I learnt from the experience?, yes. Desire to fit into the realm that did not dream of it or know of it, is not a question for me, it might be for you. I have expressed its journey and what was before.(literally)

Once those learned readers/viewers acknowledge this, this post will not need to be here. Waiting


I have removed a link from the site.

Nothing more than an article emailed to me this morning makes the matter more troubling? Also why I needed to take a different tack or focus!.

It’s on the link I removed if it matters. It ends with Barbarianism in present day Greece.

’Against the passion for ignorance’ Marina Frangiadaki