seen does not mean it does not exist
This website started just before the government at the time announced that a referendum would be called for Britain leaving the European Union. From the start maybe the idea of trying to promote the languages spoken or at least recognised in the UK was like banging my head against a brick wall. Two plus years later my head indeed feels like it had been bashed against a brick wall and the powers that be have not provided much in the way of clarity. If anything it has intensified the divisions. With an ideal to unite the country!
Popular media speak of the death of democracy. I would from my own perspective speak of the rise of insanity or a fundamental misunderstanding of the structure of perversions from a particular perspective.
I started with an idea of placing imagery on fabric. In that quest I what I knew as fabric was now available in forms that most would not believe was made with the same thing. All be it re-engineering the components of the fabric. From one perspective that is madness but it’s is not it is Addictive Manufacturing and it reaches far into industries beyond what historically was known as a printing never mind images.
I present two perspectives one more image of something real, the other photograph. Both born from the imagination one more real than the other but both factual within reason of a kind. That have roots in Britain but it’s reaches left these shores.
In a bid to engage with the wider world, a matter of protection was required. There after non disclosure agreements may need to be the order of the day. At least that is meaningful in the Uk at least, as voting for anything else seems problematic
Registered with or without spheres solid or otherwise. For general Ornamental use.
The doubts of some (at one stage even me) and the reality of others. The images work from right to left in terms of time, and from virtual to real objects, brought to you via the tools, skills and companies of Additive Manufacturing plus some ‘ blue sky thinking models’ . On the journey there was some real doubts as to whether what is pictured was actually possible because all 3d printing especially in metal need to be supported or have supports which allow for the setting or cooling of materials at different stages of the job. That obviously need to be removed!
For this unless you have a printer of your own those background tasks are not visible. Safe to say this was overcome and why I respect those whom I do not necessarily know and whose efforts even within the same company don’t know each other but from the outset made me at least recognise what has been done for the model irrespective of where they were from with best wishes to them all for what has been done and what will be done in the future all being well. and of course many thanks.
Those who will handle a hexatrigon could count them and confirm the equation for themselves if at all interested.
This post is quite important, although it is not a page i have altered before, not to avoid the truth more to try to keep it factual. It is quite difficult to represent in image that what is protected as a real object but not with the planes and is only image.And the model in 360 viewer having some problems with the colour, for multicolour 3d printing, which don’t have the same reference without it. But following suite i post these mistakes to inform / document.
Coincidence or fate? This below image relates to the productional step of above 3d model in viewer. Make special note of the percentage/ scale. I will see what i actually get and will not question one thing.
it has been some time since I spoke about this scale issue and to keep in suit with mistakes what I thought the print would look like from the model and the image proved to be INCORRECT. Although corrected or rather doubted and responded it can be done just not as seen.
Below is what I received after everything worts and all. It’s all red too.
Expressing some love one image at a time has created a situation where even when trying to factually depict actual objects. Without the real object to touch even that seems to be insufficient to convince its actuality. Even when all that can be submitted for review is photo, image, illustration, tiff or gif based. And then is perceived to be only an idea. I have many ideas yet to be formed.
Some imagery on my front page is a from what is a precursor to production via 3d print-ing. which had been imported into a photo editing program and was not edited. In conjunction with that which is the actual.
I am aware how the visual domain is indeed trapped within the structure of language. But what has been more or a surprise is how what something actual is, fails into insignificance because it is not a thing! That is not the same as language as what it is, is what it has been described or observed, but it has no history prior to that what has been presented.
If by some form of adaption like a hoop is added, does that simple action trump what was before the hoop? And does the hoop have a specific role that then determines what it can be associated with?
We stand on the shoulders of giants, what would have been the case if those giants took every thing with them? Leaving only a stick in the ground would the stick then be only used in the ground and have no other role?
This is my stick, but can you see the wick? (above the a of tessellated) Does the wick in the form of an unknown geometric form yet regular candle determine the other forms? Which would all burn or melt if the heat was sufficient with or without a flame!
In my quest of creating, some positions I personally appreciate, are not wholly shared. Without wanting to cause anymore division than that, that is already present in the once united? kingdom.
My alienating position is that not everything that means something can represent completely, without question. So my imagery as genuine as i attempted to represent it may well be too fantastical or altruistic, in contrast to ideals/beliefs of old. The categories once ascribed may be changing genders but still revel in the prejudices of old. It could be that i am a little impatient or just don’t follow the mob mentality as acts of disagreement only lead to same functions of violence in practice.
Maybe nothing truly meaningful has ever been shared without some friction. Or maybe the changes of the times wants the view on individuality be akin to the estranged/ alienated or deluded to validate a gloomier past with rose tinted spectacles. Not recognising the dark domain of the future meaning outer space, has more dark matter than light. And how if at all that universe relates to our own, with or without aliens to disrupt the protocol. Conflicts of the dark continent are still livings the affects of the enlightment.
If “they” do not have the answers who does? Not Me, Mi or You, Yu.
I do love my own creations of non friction/ non fiction 3D forms, badly, even possibly completely. Maybe I am being selfish and savagely ignorant.
The position of polar opposites is nothing new. When Freud was speaking by letters with Einstein. In regards to what / who had the more precise position on explaining Mankind in the world. Neither could make any contribution to the other in professional terms.
Both however had reason to look at what occurred in the past in order to formulate their doctrines which in one way or another had impacted on the world.
The look and how it is documented has meaning. Trouble with that is what is not pleasing finds a way to avoid that signifing structure that documents the laws of its construction.
Is there a coincidence that an atom at a quantum level and the unconscious at the level of the signifier find recognition that only seem to meet the eye in a particular setting / position.
The contributions of both positions have in one way or another influenced things that had been outside of the field of observation of that knowledge base.
The I that everyone is taught to understand oneself which is mirrored, through a particular understanding has a message which is at the very least is supposed to know that one eye has a barred structure / perspective beyond the organic matter of what is in the scope of its observation.
To recognise the symptoms of repression/signification (past) should inform the present.
Black the darkness from one perspective, White the light from another, to speak for all perspectives, subjects or just their own, I think not.
The economy of socialist spoke for people from the top down, The economy of capitalist spoke for people from the top down. The common denominator is people and what that oneself (I) sees in who they govern. Fit for chains or fit for the ovens should not be the model / goals of a progressive thinking world
The fear of the other predeterminined by the polar opposite saw in the past people leave what we called the EU on the Mayflower and The Empires on the ships fuelled by the coffee shops. That big Other of language that led to those attrocities had Romanic goals/ languages that had its own problems which is a problem of all Empires East or West that crossed the Deserts to find trade or belief.
How far should my experience / knowledge go back? lived or not. or attempt to look forward to Hexatrigons. Not to mentioned the efforts to respect those that died to give some freedoms gained.
My ‘echoes of love’ badge
(not for retail) in which I tried to express that the space which the flag took was originally blank so what would be seen as white, it could also symbolise the original colour of the poppy and the red symbolise the stain left by the blood that was spilt. Or other flags which contributed to the effort could replace the original, misguided in legal terms unknown and admitted at the time yet the sentiment remains for the appropriate authorities to…
I have used methods of production from assumption on what I believed was the way it should or could be done. This was either a move in ignorance or englightenment that is not a decision I can make. However the cost for new technologiy means that cost and retail are often not in par. It somehow makes one startled to see what I have paid and presented especially via Metal 3D printing, nevermind what the prices I was quoted for the same thing. That must have a reason I will no longer ignore. Just to say many percent plus difference, which by account may or may not equate to quality possibly a finish or material or clientelle?
My models are with those companies I have use and they are not public as yet.
Locality and knowledge has value which is subjective like most things, the role of structure/ infastructure however has a much larger outlook. Which I would be foolish to ignore. National thinking seems to have regional ignorance except with global players
Casts are not original that is why they are called reproductions.
Market price for what I have foolishly made pubic in order to satisfy my own peace of mind, from working in isolation will now be adjusted accordingly cannot speak of quality of reproduction. As that has not yet happened.
I have used very repuatble companies in order to place custom images and prints upon this site. Which those who have not understood the perspective i was coming from and the benefits it entailed may now be like me at a loss in this guise.
The limb of the branch has broken, Just because the way something is done is different is not always a hindrence when what has occured before was or is seen as a step on the progressive path and its the driving force. One anything can try as it might but can not be more unless its diluted/divided/ etc Love well that something else we try in ……..
Has the outlook formed via hexatrigon changed my outlook somewhat yes.
Is that it is more hexagonal than triangular?
Or more triangular than hexagonal?
Although the internal space formed by its geometry is still an unchartered domain where those more practical discoveries that are yet to be made or realised.