I ended up painting the yellow thing, it allowed for a reinterpretation of spinning. Not exactly forward thinking in technological terms however it does show what I tried to show quite early on in regards symmetry. I created a few images to relay this not many made it so view.
When the term ‘lived experience’ entered my lexicon, it was on the basis of a question on being(existence) via Fanon, the reply to that (if pursued) was to be wrapped in the time frame of the term ‘lived experience’. On researching, it did not follow my question, yet just used a component of it in terms of an observational trait, to be instituted.
As this did not satisfy my actual experienced research. That line of investigation ended.
The shape was not an analytical construct , yet as now having a presence it will know doubt be.
Point one, a certain program created it. The same program exported it.
Point two, a particular manufacturing process could print it. Both the creation and its subsequent learning were different to anything I knew beforehand.
The expectations of then known norms to produce it were speculations before seeing it through. Those proved it could not be done. However as it was present to view, which by default of the associated trade meant it could be manufactured.
Beyond the hand created versions that proved conceptually it was possible, no other reasonings are necessary. The properties the form possesses are consequential.
Believe it or not. The end.
Part of my lived experience? yes. Do I use it to address what was not? debatable! probably not. Did I learnt from the experience?, yes. Desire to fit into the realm that did not dream of it or know of it, is not a question for me, it might be for you. I have expressed its journey and what was before.(literally)
Once those learned readers/viewers acknowledge this, this post will not need to be here. Waiting
I remember I did not have any marks then. The only cap i put a heart on did not think you would see the lips. Different era or new
Only clicked just now:-)
Some seem to think that what I have been through is some kind of non believable events. I know since I started this site fake news was not in my vocabulary, however neither was the reality of calls that were not actually in relation to what the number was attached to!
The sims, the phones, the computers, the hard drives internal, external, disk based, solid state. All have in one way or another not been what I had been used to beforehand.
I created the lips when I did not have a computer, it was on an app which since has gone pro and is also on computer! I registered the 3d physical forms on a phone. The trademark was carried out on computer. I also moved in that time too. Lost some stuff there too.
The one or two things I had not done before seem to be that which if known, those want it to be recognised by someone else and when it is it is ignored anyway. If I used the knowledge from a supposed position those would still not want to hear. The ignorance of some to just entrench more ignorance is startling.
So thanks for that.
On the flip side there is now ….. what was before and then somethings leftover. I started off with the notion of two numbers one for …. the other…. because what I never mentioned here about the issues relating to the last time I had broadband/ land line. If known, you would probably asked yourself why I even tried! There would have been less content online for sure. I think the reality of esims will have one sim for .. and another for… in a handset, and other devices too no doubt. With some additive manufacturing maybe and a dataset definitely.
The first spheres were not for a joke or gimmick and neither were the second. I may be isolated from the group in question. But picture this, Or not.
we live in 3D space and so much of that is informed by something less so.
often what is not said speaks volumes.
arranged spheres to make an imagined part viable . It started with an iOS screenshot, for viewing purposes only. Jan 31 / Feb 2020
It seems as though me using Trojanthinking as my tag for decades has now due to whatever is becoming problematic. If you notice time stamps on posts you will see 2018 is when the metal form came about. I have used the name from the early nineties.
( Image was the different views of food safe rows done way before production when i thought injection moulding reproduction was a viable option. Simple product would have been an icetray) it did perform as such but was economically speaking unpractical..
Although it might be the only model I will not see I will show how the journey and the speculation of previous post has manifested. I will show this in pictures. Both created for their respective process methods. One sls, shown previously on this site. And one for ultimately casting. Both of them if manufactured are as real as the other from my perspective. Only difference is alterations best suited for manufacture, maybe a title or name of the file. Both are with the respective manufacturers. I wonder if that is how it was supposed to be in the long run. I definitely didn’t plan it. I hope to manufacture it in time. And it ended with no bad will.
I recently pressed custom red lips on a printed model which came out well. I placed it on a press which I did right at the beginning of my material journey. It was on carbon fibre it was bought online. It was was a heart in fact it had several. which due to the background came of in regards the image left on paper but was very difficult to see. If I remember correctly it may have been one of the last times I went to see the printers. Which now has become a coffee shop. The material was encased in resin which made it possible. You might be able to pick it out of the background. Other images may be found of the original on trojanthinking.wordpress.com
just to think of how this image came into being crosses not only years of experience, theory, practice, language, meaning. materials and borders.
It was less than a day old. (Image that is)
This time it was used after the image press rather than before ( experience from working with the ceramic tiles)