I have printed my refocused efforts in NYLON, cast in polyester. The intermediate processes involved much of what I have spoken of on this domain and www.trojanthinking.wordpress.com
The transitions was, not just the words that was a process which was also printed.
The original concept before when lips or hearts were its attachments allowed for in its basic structure visual orientations. I have had some difficulties traversing this grey area in regard to product classifications and such.
If an opening in the purposeful additions determine one purpose alone where / how would you choose put it to use?
This site has been the kernel for many things to begin to manifest. Admittedly not many of them made it to the market, but at the very least they left the domain of imagination.
The original theme was more about connection and union of ideals. Or at least the acknowledgement of differences, and not as anything new!
On attempting to bring some colour into the Braille condition. Led to situation when another printing job I raised was cancelled, at my request I might add. On the basis of what thought I uploaded was as is.
That was not the case. What I was informed was one file looked like it was grey. Which if I am honest ironically makes more sense. I am yet to find out which one it was, But it was printable I must state.
My perspective was on one giving to another, However who would notice or recognise the difference and who could read it?( I am no expert either!!!)
Due to certain complications the image relating to this topic I am speaking of is unusable. But all that is different from this image is that the (Braille) is the colour of the lips, but has no lips!! Plus the orientation automatically changed!!
Keep posted for advances one way or another for better or worse.
Update! I found out which one it was and I really should have remembered but somehow I must have done without realising No need to explain this one any further,
Pre blue sky thinking, manifest.
In a bid to engage with the wider world, a matter of protection was required. There after non disclosure agreements may need to be the order of the day. At least that is meaningful in the Uk at least, as voting for anything else seems problematic
Registered with or without spheres solid or otherwise. For general Ornamental use.
Expressing some love one image at a time has created a situation where even when trying to factually depict actual objects. Without the real object to touch even that seems to be insufficient to convince its actuality. Even when all that can be submitted for review is photo, image, illustration, tiff or gif based. And then is perceived to be only an idea. I have many ideas yet to be formed.
Some imagery on my front page is a from what is a precursor to production via 3d print-ing. which had been imported into a photo editing program and was not edited. In conjunction with that which is the actual.
I am aware how the visual domain is indeed trapped within the structure of language. But what has been more or a surprise is how what something actual is, fails into insignificance because it is not a thing! That is not the same as language as what it is, is what it has been described or observed, but it has no history prior to that what has been presented.
If by some form of adaption like a hoop is added, does that simple action trump what was before the hoop? And does the hoop have a specific role that then determines what it can be associated with?
We stand on the shoulders of giants, what would have been the case if those giants took every thing with them? Leaving only a stick in the ground would the stick then be only used in the ground and have no other role?
This is my stick, but can you see the wick? (above the a of tessellated) Does the wick in the form of an unknown geometric form yet regular candle determine the other forms? Which would all burn or melt if the heat was sufficient with or without a flame!
It is approximately a year since the ice versions made it to this site. At this seasonal time when a year ago we had the ‘beast from the east’ in the uk, other than to say seasonal greetings and mi luv yu bad in its various forms like the various ice hexatrigons, which when melted created the colour of the current version at the top of the front page.
In my quest of creating, some positions I personally appreciate, are not wholly shared. Without wanting to cause anymore division than that, that is already present in the once united? kingdom.
My alienating position is that not everything that means something can represent completely, without question. So my imagery as genuine as i attempted to represent it may well be too fantastical or altruistic, in contrast to ideals/beliefs of old. The categories once ascribed may be changing genders but still revel in the prejudices of old. It could be that i am a little impatient or just don’t follow the mob mentality as acts of disagreement only lead to same functions of violence in practice.
Maybe nothing truly meaningful has ever been shared without some friction. Or maybe the changes of the times wants the view on individuality be akin to the estranged/ alienated or deluded to validate a gloomier past with rose tinted spectacles. Not recognising the dark domain of the future meaning outer space, has more dark matter than light. And how if at all that universe relates to our own, with or without aliens to disrupt the protocol. Conflicts of the dark continent are still livings the affects of the enlightment.
If “they” do not have the answers who does? Not Me, Mi or You, Yu.
I do love my own creations of non friction/ non fiction 3D forms, badly, even possibly completely. Maybe I am being selfish and savagely ignorant.
The platform used to create the products and images seen on this domain were created on a mac. This is not about status or critique on other platforms. Since creating Hexatrigon it has become more of an issue that the platform is less compatible for engineering / CAD production. Or more precisely the shape
The understanding of manufacturing infrastructure depends on earlier developments so that dynamic makes sense. However even though costs can overcome this problem that is not something that will immediately change. However I do not believe the shape would exist, in such platforms, as the 3D form would not ‘close’, and not made up with other polygonal forms.
Does that mean it should not exist?
It clearly does, and follows the principles of regular polyhedra.
The creation of the solid digital model that produced the model I call hexatrigon was exported as .stl. Further reading on the field that this format inhabits was as new as the creation was for me. More research on the infrastructure of the technology has me recognising the new dynamics and not just for me.
The UK is the base from which I create and from a extremely insulated position, that is displayed on this domain. The limited exposure to the market was largely subjectively, protection based in the sense of ownership, not with the ear to its global movements. Coincidence has happened in the sense that links and references placed on this domain are part of the same movement but isolated. Not being part of the larger thinking and not recognising the current infrastructure as the immediate target for the use of additive manufacture. Hexatrigon would not exist or be distributable without it. The experiences of Heaxtrigons’ digital production has been a steep learning curve, which has been at cutting edge driven by a singular obsession of making it real. If the difference in the metal frame models of its form with or without spheres on its vertices (that image of problem is not my property ) not its materials is limited by production limitation governed by their programming it was not a conscious disruptive move.
However it is a product of the technology that produces the best representations in terms of precision of its form.
Custom (3D) printing / Additive Manufacturing.